Joe "OuTkAsT-1" Topolnisky
The FileFront has caught up with Havok's Steve Collins for a quick Q&A regarding their popular physics engine. They chat about everything from working with game developers to how the engine started out. Snip:
Q: What type of testing and research did you do for the engine to make the physics more realistic?
A: Its sorta interesting in that for the game engine were not interested inaccuracy. We spend all our time on performance and memory usage optimization. The laws of physics are pretty well known, and writing a simulator is actually reasonably straightforward. The catch is making it fast and robust enough to deploy in a game. So the rule of thumb is does is look right. If it looks right then it is right, and the people who judge that are the game designers and artists not the engineers. In many situations in games, the physics is very unrealistic: people dont run at 80 mph but in FPS games they do. In order to optimize the engine we sacrifice realism for speed, and push that compromise to the point where the physics is still plausible.
- Lenovo Erazer X700 Gaming Desktop PC Review
- Cooler Master Storm Power-RX Mouse Pad Review
- Synology DiskStation DS1513+ 5-Bay NAS Review
- Gigabyte Aivia Uranium Wireless Gaming Mouse Review
- Western Digital Black² 1TB Dual Drive Reviews
- MSI GT70 2OC 17.3-inch Gaming Notebook Review
- Fractal Design Tesla R2 650W Power Supply Review
- Cooler Master Hyper TX3 EVO CPU Cooler Review
- Western Digital Red 4TB Hard Drive Review
- Corsair Vengeance K95 Mechanical Gaming Keyboard Review